| Johan Unregistered |
Hi, if i would have 400 euro to spend, where should i spend it on? I now have: | |||
| Enlightenment Administrator 108 posts |
The real question becomes: is your CPU still sufficient for modern games. My experience is that video cards still are the biggest bottlenecks and as such you better concentrate on a good videocard instead. Take control of the input and you shall become master of the output. | |||
| Johan Unregistered |
So i should buy GeForce 8800GTS for example? Will my CPU have enough power for this video card? | |||
| Enlightenment Administrator 108 posts |
That is quite an expensive videocard, around 360 euro. If you feel it's worth it then i think you will enjoy nice speeds and good graphics. Your CPU will be a bottleneck in lower resolutions. If you plan to play in 1600x1200 however, then it will be fine. If you are thinking about 1280x1024 then a faster processor will probably yield higher results. But replacing your processor now might not be a good idea, since new generations will arrive relatively soon. Take control of the input and you shall become master of the output. | |||
| Mike Hober Unregistered |
Seriously dude never buy those really expensive stuff. It's old and cheap within some 6 months so why waste your money? Just buy a reasonable card, wait till 8600GT comes out for example (or is it out already?) and buy one of those. And whenever the next-generation of processors (AMD barcelona?) comes out upgrade your base system. | |||
| Crafty Unregistered |
Got a new AMD 6000+ (dualcore 3GHz 2MB) for less than 145 euro. Even the E6600 costs about 195 euro and the motherboards tend to be more expensive too. So i think AMD's pricecuts made them really attractive even though now everybody is talking about Intel this and Core 2 Duo that. What do you think? | |||
| X00X Unregistered |
3GHz AMD? How much heat will that produce? I'd rather stick to a Core 2 Duo, even though they might be more expensive. | |||
| Enlightenment Administrator 108 posts |
the 6000+ has a TDP of 125W, a lot higher than the 89W TDP of other models. But you should know that the idle usage is a lot lower, especially when using Cool'N'Quiet, which you should. Also, AMD uses only about 70% of rated TDP value. Intel uses close to 85% to 95% and is more power consuming when being idle. Take control of the input and you shall become master of the output. |
| Reply to this topic | Last Page |
execution time: 63 msec, queries: 32







